Sun and Darkness

Seeing Things: Godwin’s Law and Smith’s Syndrome

mr smith, who blogs at mr smith’s refusal, offers this major essay on every side a malady that has afflicted virtually all of us in the vast moral-wing conspiracy at one someday or another.this is the latest in his occasional seeing things series.

seeing things: godwin’s law and smith’s syndromeby mr smithreading baron bodissey’s piece on the “ubiquity of white racism” back in november of ‘07, i was struck by the persistence of godwin’s law. as can be seen by the baron’s piece and all related issues and articles, sober we who see more distinctly the threat posed to western civilisation’ are affected by godwin’s law to some caste. notwithstanding the known enmity that factious correctness poses to limpidity of thought and free sales pitch, many among our number who pursue and desire guileless vision and released speech have a phobia of labels, to the extent that godwin’s law still applies even in this little vaguely right-wing, counter-jihad corner of the internet.ahead of going further, i should throw light on that this is properly a apprehension, as it is an irrational fear, in excess proportion to the cause of the fear. the fear weight be justified if accusations of nazi!’ or racist!’ or fascist!’ carried any meaning today, but it is increasingly the case that they do not. conducive to example, i have hitherto to listen to a working demarcation of fascism from a leftist which is not essentially what most people in the west thought on the subjects of the dogs and nation prior to the bring to an end of ww2, while i am sure that many readers who have criticised islam or size, unchecked immigration will be familiar with the knee-dweeb nature of the racist!’ and nazi!’ accusations.the principal defence of leftist little, of this massive paradigm shift in thought on the questions of watercourse, nation, and culture, tends to be that it is due to progress’ and liberation’ of thought. but progress, as chesterton noted, “is simply a comparative of which we have not settled the superlative”. that is to say, we are told (frequently, and earnestly) that progress’ is a intimate phobia and to be desired, but we are never told what the destination is nor why we should desire it. progress’ is position appropriate for movement’s sake, and brings us no closer to an sighting any sane in the flesh would yearn for. as object of liberation’ of thought, i can only wonder how freely the welshman arrested and convicted of racist abuse’ on the underpinning of no trace and no schlemihl would say this brave new world is.this is no progress, then. no-one has been liberated by this mental apartheid of all peoples into designated sucker groups and de jure racist’ groups (as all whites are merely by merit of being white, so we’re time after time told), rather we are imprisoned in an asylum of the mind, both inmates and wardens, regressing (or progressively travelling’?) at a rate of knots to a thought control stalin could only have imagined in his wildest dreams. and all for fear of a label. for fear of a vapid accusation thrown in to shut us up somewhat than contribute anything of value to anyone at all.- – - – - – - – -which brings us in a evasive way back to godwin, whose law states that as a conversation goes on, the distinct possibility of at one wingding calling the other a nazi approaches 1. the corollary which is perhaps outdo known is that once this motivation has been fired, the discussion ends. the identification of this law has allowed many to overcome the nazi accusation and continue conversations liking for mature adults, which is quite right and proper as far as it goes. but does this go very much enough? recent events advocate not, and even excellent writers such as fjordman the arrant can be and have been accused of nazi-ist sympathies (an impute about as sensible as accusing turkeys of voting for christmas) by people who were formerly cerebration to be on the same side as the breathing-spell of us. some reaction against this inability for western whites to ever do right in the eyes of our detractors can be seen in the excellent brussels journal piece “are we all nazis nowadays?”.those who have interpret orwell’s save nineteen eighty-four (and some who have not) will be well aware of the word “thought police” and all it implies, but a more relevant concept to our current circums
Usefull links: Napolean dynamite